Chapter 1
Introduction
to International and Comparative Law
i.
Definitions
1.
Public
international law: The division of
international law that deals primarily with. the rights and duties of states
and intergovernmental organizations as between themselves.
2.
Jus cogens: A peremptory norm of
general international law, recognized by the. international community of states
as a norm from which no derogation is permitted.
3.
Executive agreements: A treaty or
international agreement entered into by a state’s executive without following
the state’s constitutionally required ratification procedure. It is not
effective domestically.
4.
Servitude: A right to the use of
another’s property, such as the right of passage; it. also includes the right
to prevent other countries from engaging in harmful acts in their territory,
such as the right to prevent the implement transboundary pollution.
5.
State responsibility: Liability of a state for the
injuries that it causes to foreign. persons. Traditionally, an individual can't
claim rights directly from a country that damages his interests.
ii.
True or False
1. Comity is not law because countries do not regard it as something
they are required to respect.
Answer: True
2. In contemporary international law, the division between public
and private law is precise and well defined.
Answer: False
3. International law is not really law since there is no worldwide
legislature to enact it.
Answer: False
4. Once adopted, customary rules of international law are seldom
changed.
Answer: False
5. In international tribunals, municipal law is regarded as being
correlative with international law.
Answer: False
6. In municipal courts, international law is
generally treated as being subservient.
Answer: False
7. According to the doctrine of incorporation,
customary international laws are treated as adopted by a municipal court to the
extent that they are not inconsistent with prior municipal legislation or
judicial decisions of final authority.
Answer: True
8. According to the doctrine of transformation, customary
international laws are not applicable in a municipal court until they are
clearly adopted by legislative action, judicial decision, or established local
usage.
Answer: True
9. A self-executing treaty is one that
contains a provision that says the treaty will apply in the parties’ municipal
courts once the parties have adopted domestic enabling legislation.
Answer: False
10. A successor state is not bound by the
“dispositive” treaties made by its predecessor.
Answer: False
11. An intergovernmental organization is a
permanent organization set up by two or more states to carry on activities of
common interest.
Answer: True
12. A successor state is not bound by the private
contractual obligations of its predecessors.
Answer: False
13. To a treaty made by State
A can agree either to terminate the treaty or extend it to the whole territory
of the new state.
Answer: True
14. When State A and State B merge to form State C, State C will no
longer be bound by a treaty made by State A if its object and purpose can no
longer be accomplished.
Answer: True
15. When a part of the territory of State X shifts and becomes part of
the territory of State Y, the treaties made by State X continue to apply to
that territory.
Answer: False
iii.
Multiple Choice
1. International law regulates relationships between:
a)
states and states.
b)
states and persons.
c)
persons and persons.
d)
All of the above.
Answer: d
2. Which
of the following is an example/are examples of the subject matter of public
international law?
a)
Contracts and sales.
b)
Securities regulations.
c)
State succession.
d)
All of the above.
Answer: c
3. Evidence
of the general consent of the international community to the existence of a
rule of international law can be found in:
a)
decisions of the International Court of Justice.
b)
resolutions passed by the UN General Assembly.
c)
the conduct and practices of states in their dealings between
themselves.
d)
All of the above.
Answer: d
4. Which
of the following sources of international law does the International Court of
Justice normally regard as the most authoritative?
a)
Customary international law.
b)
General principles of law.
c)
International conventions.
d)
Judicial decisions.
Answer: c
5. In the United
States, a treaty adopted by authority of the President alone (i.e., without the
consent of the Senate) is known as a/an:
a)
constitutional convention.
b)
executive agreement.
c)
presidential treaty.
d)
Truman treaty.
Answer: b
6. “The legal
existence of a government happens automatically by operation of law whenever a
government is capable of controlling a territory and its people.” This is a statement of the:
a)
constitutive doctrine.
b)
declaratory doctrine.
c)
Estrada doctrine.
d)
recognitive doctrine.
Answer: b
7. The right of
all states to transit the Suez and Panama canals is an example of a/an:
a)
easement.
b)
license.
c)
negative servitude.
d)
positive servitude.
Answer: d
8. When
one speaks of the “supernational powers” of the European Union, one means that:
a)
within its scope of
applicability, EU law is superior to the laws of the member states.
b)
member states are required
to bring their internal laws into compliance with EU law.
c)
EU law may be directly
effective within the member states.
d)
All of the above.
Answer: d
9. “When a new state comes into being through
decolonization, the ex-colony starts with no obligation to succeed to the
treaties of its former colonial power.”
This is known as the:
a)
clean slate doctrine.
b)
divorcement policy.
c)
exparte doctrine.
d)
fresh start rule.
Answer: a
10. Which of the following is NOT a
characteristic common to intergovernmental organizations?
a)
They are created by two or
more states.
b)
They are meant to pursue
interests common to their creators.
c)
They function autonomously
as independent international persons.
d)
They operate through
branches and subsidiaries around the world.
Answer: d
iv.
Case
1. State A came into existence
following a lengthy civil war that resulted in dramatic political, economic,
and social upheaval. As part of the
changes brought about in State A, the government nationalized property
belonging to Company Q, but paid Company Q no compensation for the
property. The owners of Company Q, all
State A citizens, who had fled to State B during the course of the civil war,
have now brought suit in a State B court claiming that they are the true owners
of the property. They petition the court
to grant them title to the property or to order State A to fully compensate
them for its wrongful taking. Should
Company Q's owners’ petition be granted?
Discuss.
(Refer to Case 1-6 De Sanchez v. Banco Central de Nicaragua).
Answer: It's anything but an infringement of global
law for a state to seize the property of its nationals. Nor may nationals sue
their country in an unfamiliar court for any supposed bad behavior, except if
the bad behavior is an appalling depravation of an individual's opportunities
that is cognizable as a misdeed under global law. This isn't the circumstance
here, so the case ought to be excused.

0 Comments
Post a Comment
please leave nice comment to support us to continuing